CLICK THROUGH TO READ THE LETTERS TO THE CRIMINAL SCUM KNOWN AS LORD JUSTICE LLOYD...LETTERS PREDICTING HIS CRIMES AND ASKING FOR THE SUPPORT OF THE MET POLICE...WHO LET IT ALL HAPPEN...SO THE MET'S OWN CRIMES IN THESE MATTERS CAN ALSO BE COVERED-UP..."BIRDS OF A FEATHER FUCK THE INNOCENT TOGETHER" YOU MIGHT SAY.
Chris Coomber
![]()
LETTER OF 23RD MAY - THE DAY AFTER THE CORRUPT JUDGMENT
Lord Justice Lloyd
LETTER OF 13TH APRIL - PREDICTING LLOYD'S CRIMES + NOTIFYING THE POLICE
Dear Lord Justice Lloyd
Yours sincerely
PS. We have copied this correspondence to Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe as Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, and will continue to do so until the ongoing Misconduct / Corruption within the Royal Courts of Justice stops, and before a death is caused…i.e. a death through Reckless Endangerment / Manslaughter by Judicial Office Holders.
LETTER OF 1ST APRIL - LLOYD MAKES HIS FIRST MOVE TO STIFLE THE ALLEGATIONS...AND ANOUNCES HIS RETIREMENT THE DAY AFTER
Dear Lord Justice Lloyd
Chris Coomber
LETTER OF 23RD MAY - THE DAY AFTER THE CORRUPT JUDGMENT
Lord Justice Lloyd
Civil Appeal Court
Royal Courts of Justice
London WC2A 2LL
Chris Coomber & Dawn Burrus
27 Mayfield Road
Crouch End
London N8 9LL
cc1: Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe – Commissioner – Metropolitan Police
cc2: Rt Hon David Cameron – Prime Minister
cc3: Rt Hon Chris Grayling MP – Lord Chancellor
cc4: Rt Hon Vince Cable MP – Business Secretary
cc5: Dr Richard Judge – Head of the Insolvency Service
cc6: Karen Jackson – Official Receiver - London
cc7: Sarah Parkes – Partner – Freshfields LLP
23rd May ‘13
BY EMAIL
Re: Your Criminal Conduct – “The Greystones Fraud & Cover-Up”
This letter is to state, for the record, that following your recent brazen and sickening contribution to the Cover-Up, i.e. after your premeditated an unlawful dismissal of our “bullet proof” Applications following the Hearing of the 17th May, we formally accuse you of the Criminal Acts of Misconduct in Public Office & Conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Justice.
Whilst we do not intend to go into detail in this correspondence:
1. You were assigned to our Applications after the forced recusation of LJ Gross & LJ Rimer, and with the intent (as they both had) of unlawfully dismissing our Applications entirely regardless of the merits / evidence.
2. You refused to recuse yourself after having been forced to disclose links with several parties involved in the Fraud & Cover-Up, and after we pleaded with you that there must be other Appeal Court Judges with fewer links with the Accused, and that the Court had a duty to try and protect our Human Rights…which have been trampled upon with impunity for the last 4+ years.
3. You then denied us due process, and a vital Appeal step, by taking the exceptional stance of denying us a determination “on the papers”, and forcing a one day Oral Hearing which we demanded needed to be at least 3 days.
4. You also denied us the opportunity to have the Hearing with more than one Appeal Court Judge.
5. In the Judgment that you handed down yesterday, during which we walked out as we could not stand to hear another word from your corrupt mouth, you dishonestly misrepresented both fact and law to ensure that the entirely unequivocal evidence of Fraud was adjudged to be unable to substantiate any of our allegations whatsoever.
6. We said then, and we say again now, that is complete BULLSHIT…with your complete disregard for the evidence relating to “THE SIX COMPANIES” (summary attached…discussed by Chris Coomber for 2+ hours at the Hearing…and with hundreds of pages of more detailed evidence also provided showing that these Companies / Money Laundering Vehicles are all highly interconnected and relate to “The Greystones Fraud Scheme AND Cover-Up”) set up by “Alan Bloom & Co” bringing your deceit and grave criminality into very sharp focus.
7. Your statements made us feel physically sick (and still do) and against stiff competition your conduct, and by some considerable margin, is the most blatantly corrupt that we have witnessed in the last approaching 4 years of attending the Royal Courts of “Justice”.
8. You brazenly spent the first 45m of the Judgment describing the prior conduct of your Judicial Colleagues, with the sole intention of exonerating these corrupt people, many of whom are your close friends/associates, through repeated gross misrepresentations of the facts, & the law.
9. Oddly (or so it seemed at the time), you also took the opportunity to comment on the matters relating to the bogus Winding-Up of our defrauded Company “Greystone Houses Ltd” by HMRC, using a corrupt Barrister (Mark Fell…from your old Chambers) exposed as the close colleague of Lord Justice Lewison’s son Joshua Lewison…a person with whom you have also been exposed as being an acquaintance of.
10.Specifically you mocked the allegations relating to this central plank of the Cover-Up, and awarded the guilty parties the “Appeal Court Seal of Approval”…although you somehow forgot to mention that we have proven that the subsequent liquidation of “Greystone House Ltd” was also completely bogus.
11.You also failed to declare, despite going through the sham of the exercise of disclosing your links with the Conspirators, that you & your close family not only have links with HMRC, but these links are with Mike Clasper himself…who resigned his role as Chairman of HMRC in April ’12 under a shadow (after having abused his powers and position to strike “sweetheart deals” with large Companies to avoid tax…at the expense of the UK Public…sound familiar?) within just a few days of this completely bogus Winding-Up Hearing.
12.You have also failed to declare your Wife’s links to / common interests with Richard Sharp, i.e.:
a. the husband of your associate Justice Victoria Sharp…who has also played, and is still playing, a pivotal role in the Cover-Up…with my unlawful arrest “just happening” to be on the very day I was due to submit the (pre-issued…as a result of the unlawful Restraining Order against me) Application which documented the links between Lord Justice Lewison and the Conspirators…an Application improperly dismissed (and with malice) by Justice Sharp…many months later;
b. a close associate of David Cameron, George Osborne & Boris Johnson;
c. one of the Conservative Party’s largest personal donors of all time;
d. a recent appointee to the Bank of England;
e. an ex-Partner of Goldman Sachs…which “just happens” to be one of the Companies which Mr Clasper was so kind in subsidising.
Everything we feared and predicted in the correspondence of the last few weeks came true yesterday morning as you abused your Judicial Oath, and committed Criminal Acts, to hand down a Judgment (which bears no relation to the legal arguments made and the evidence produced) crafted to protect the guilty accused, at the same time as enthusiastically denying us any route to securing redress as completely innocent parties who will now lose their family home to an Official Receiver exposed as also acting in appalling bad-faith as part of the Cover-Up.
It was after we had predicted you would “do the dirty” to perpetuate the Cover-Up that we read that both you and LJ Rix (also heavily implicated in the Cover-Up, inc. being an intimate friend of the Grabiner family) had resigned from your Judicial roles a number of years early and unexpectedly, with LJ Rix departing the Royal Courts on THE VERY DAY of the announcement, and with you “just happening” to hand-down your Orders refusing to recuse yourself and forcing an Oral Hearing THE DAY BEFORE that announcement.
We previously described that what we believed you were planning was your “Swan Song”, and we have no doubt whatsoever that you have accepted bribes of some kind which will help you soothe your conscience (if you have one…which we doubt) and fund your premature retirement…bribes which we also believe you have recently accepted for your lead role in also covering up blatant Fraud at HBOS.
We made you a promise as we left the Court yesterday, i.e. that we would hold you accountable for your Crimes against ourselves and our children, and that is a promise that will we keep, and a promise which also applies to your fellow scumbags within & without the Court. We will not let you get away with what you have done.
LETTER OF 13TH APRIL - PREDICTING LLOYD'S CRIMES + NOTIFYING THE POLICE
Lord Justice Lloyd
Civil Appeal Court
Royal Courts of Justice
The Strand
London WC2A 2LL
Chris Coomber & Dawn Burrus
27 Mayfield Road
Crouch End
London N8 9LL
cc1: Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe – Commissioner – Metropolitan Police
cc2: Lord Dyson – Master of the Rolls / Head of the Civil Appeal Court
cc3: Lord Judge – Lord Chief Justice
cc4: Rt Hon David Cameron MP – Prime Minister
cc5: Rt Hon Chris Grayling MP – Lord Chancellor
cc6: Rt Hon Vince Cable MP – Business Secretary
cc7: Rt Hon Damian Green MP - Minister for Police & Criminal Justice
cc8: Dr Richard Judge – Head of the Insolvency Service
cc9: Karen Jackson – Official Receiver - London
cc10: Paul Stewart – Deputy Official Receiver – London
cc11: Andrew Turek – Treasury Solicitor
cc12: Sarah Parkes – Partner – Freshfields LLP
cc13: Lauren McGuirl – Associate – Freshfields LLP
13th April ‘13
BY EMAIL &/OR RECORDED DELIVERY
Re: The Appeal Court’s Ongoing Misconduct / Withholding of Due Process – “The Greystones Fraud & Cover-Up”
Further to our correspondence of 1st& 10th April (attached…to which we have received no response) we are writing to express our disgust at how the Appeal Court continues to deny us (as the Victims of “The Greystones Fraud & Cover-Up”) due process of law, and for blatantly Improper Purposes.
Between the Bankruptcy Court and the Appeal Court our “bullet-proof” Applications to have our unlawful Bankruptcies Annulled (on the basis they should never have been made), and our parallel Application to re-open our initial Civil Fraud Claim (on the basis of proven irregularities in the Court and a mass of fresh evidence), have now been delayed by the Court for a total of over 12 months, with the normal period for determination, and especially given the devastating implications of Bankruptcy, being a matter of weeks.
In a “Nutshell”, members of the Upper and Lower Court have colluded, and are still colluding, and are subverting the Judicial Process (including the Personal Bankruptcy Process) to deliberately orchestrate a situation whereby we are denied access to Justice to seek redress for the unlawful acts of proven Fraudsters, at the same time as those Fraudsters are being afforded the protection of the Court…and not for the first time. This conduct constitutes the Criminal Offences of Perversion of the Course of Justice &/or Misconduct in Public Office, and must stop.
As described in the recent correspondence to you, whilst you may try and assert that your recent Orders, i.e. to effectively join the Applications, has provided some remedy to this appalling situation, the fact that you then adjourned all 3 of those Applications to be heard in a (ludicrously short) Oral Hearing, is as grossly prejudicial to us as it is improper…as we are being denied our right to have Judgments “on the papers” before any such Oral Hearing. This is just the latest of a long series of irregularities within the Appeal Court, subsequent to a series of irregularities within the High Court.
As we believe is the intent of these delays, and with us exercising our right to not co-operate with the Official Receiver until our Annulment Applications are fully determined, the Official Receiver (i.e. Ms Karen Jackson) has now “pushed the button” to execute our Bankruptcies.
Specifically Ms Jackson, in the full knowledge that these delays are not of our making and that our Bankruptcies were orchestrated through grave abuses of the Insolvency & Judicial Processes, has:
1. Seized the income upon which we and our 3 children depend upon to live.
2. Blocked our Bank Account to seize the monies we do have.
3. As a result of our orchestrated and sickeningly unjust destitution, has ensured that our own family home would soon be repossessed, as will the properties from which we derive our income, as no mortgages can be paid.
It is our sincere belief, and based upon a detailed knowledge of the law, that there is no justification whatsoever for this conduct, and it must therefore be motivated by Bad-Faith / Improper Purposes / Undue Influence
Relatedly, whilst we are now aware of the conflict of interest which relates to the perverse funding arrangements for the Official Receiver’s Office…
(i.e. where the Official Receiver takes a reported 17% of the monies realised from Estates in Bankruptcy, and hence is actually incentivised; and perhaps even personally given that Civil Servants have a bonus scheme; to abuse their powers and positions to “grab” anything (and especially when the recovery from the Estate is low anyway…as in our case) that they can get their hands on, and to execute cases which are so clearly unjust, to ensure job security / advancement / bonuses);
…we cannot believe that Ms Jackson (or anybody other than a complete sociopath) would knowingly cause the harm / threat to life that Ms Jackson is causing without there being some other factors at play…i.e. over and above “balancing the books” and a “few extra quid at Xmas”.
Fortifying this belief of Impropriety / Undue Influence is the ongoing conduct of the Court which has delayed the determination of these Applications until Ms Jackson has acted against us. Specifically it was only after Ms Jackson had wreaked this havoc / harm without justification, and when we had then reluctantly agreed to attend interview (i.e. to provide a formal statement of all assets and liabilities), that you made out the recent Orders which attempted to deny us our rights…yet again.
As we have previously described, we are now caught in a “pincer action” orchestrated by yourself and Ms Jackson (who is acting as an Officer of the Court) whereby we, and our 3 children, are subject to even further financial intimidation, and at exactly the same time as you have “dangled the carrot” of a possible resolution via an expedited Oral Hearing, when in reality (and pardon my mixed metaphors) this “carrot” is a “poisoned chalice”, and we are being entrapped as part of the relentless and ever more blatant Cover-Up.
Specifically:
1. Whilst the case for the Annulment of our Bankruptcies (on the basis that the Orders should never have been made) is “bullet-proof”, we are being forced (and by unlawful means) to attend interview with the Official Receiver against our free will, i.e. to provide a formal Statement of our Assets and Liabilities, with our liabilities being high (because of the Fraud) and our assets being low (because of the Fraud, and also because the merits of the £multi-million Claims we have against numerous parties are being denigrated…and for Improper Purposes, i.e. as part of the Cover-Up).
2. It is our fear that, on the basis of these Statements of Assets and Liabilities, and motivated by ongoing Undue Influence / Bad-Faith / Improper Purposes, that Ms Jackson as Official Receiver will then make a Report to the Court and will make Oral Representations at the Hearings relating to our Annulments (which she has no right to even attend), the effect of which will be that the Court (and irregularly / for Improper Purposes), will refuse our Annulment (on the basis that we are Insolvent anyway…i.e. even if the Criminally Motivated Petition by E&Y was extinguished) and without having to consider, or comment on, the allegations of Fraud and Cover-Up…i.e. perpetuating the Cover-Up still further.
3. These fears are not just speculation, all the evidence points towards this being the dishonest plan, and nothing points away from it, including your recent Orders which were an attempt to ensure that you would not have to comment on the evidence of Fraud & Cover-Up (i.e. through the determinations “on the papers”) before you dismissed the Annulment Applications on the basis described above, with those dismissals meaning that we will (despite being Victims of a proven Fraud & Cover-Up) have no control over our Civil Claims (i.e. for Fraud, Negligence etc.) as those Claims are “vested” in (i.e. controlled by) the Official Receiver…who will then, in further abuses of position / powers, ensure these highly meritorious Claims never see the light of day.
4. Relatedly, a key item of recently exposed evidence, evidence which brings the existence of this dishonest scheme and the bad-faith / improper conduct of Ms Jackson into even sharper focus, is the following extract from the Official Receiver’s Technical Manual:
Specifically the above demonstrates that Ms Jackson, as the Official Receiver who “just happened” to take personal control over our cases upon the publication of a mass of still further and entirely damning fresh evidence…including evidence which demonstrates that the sick Fraud that we are Victims of was initiated even before the start of the Administration of Kaupthing Singer & Friedlander AND that Paul Kemsley (the close friend of Sir Philip Green, Lord Sugar & THFC’s Daniel Levy) was at the heart of the Fraud Scheme:
a. Has acted precipitously and in bad-faith, and in the full knowledge of the wider circumstances of this case, i.e. that our Bankruptcies have been orchestrated through both a Fraud on the Court / Abuse of Process, and through associated Judicial Misconduct.
b. Is abusing her position and powers to deliberately place assets and income in jeopardy with the sole intent (and with our Creditors’ interests being collateral damage rather than the focus of Ms Jackson’s Duties) being to harm us and to stifle the allegations, inc. by forcing our cooperation with her Office in the full knowledge that this co-operation will “seal our fate”.
5. That these fears are not mere speculation is also nicely evidenced in the following extract from the same Official Receiver’s Technical Manual:
Specifically, whilst our cases are as “genuine” as the Court is ever likely to see, and hence we have no legal or moral obligation to co-operate with the Official Receiver, we have no doubt whatsoever that the Court, and yourself specifically, and in a “Joint Venture” with the Official Receiver / the Treasury Solicitor / the Conspirators, intend to:
a. Ignore the evidence and argument and to deliberately misrepresent our case as “non-genuine”, i.e. so you are free to operate as if you are granting us an “indulgence”…i.e. as some kind of good-will gesture…and when this could not be further from the truth.
b. Invite / request the involvement of the Official Receiver, inc. the drafting / submission of an Official Receiver’s Report to the Court…which will include a formal Statement of Assets & Liabilities from our unlawfully enforced interviews.
c. Take the fact that we have not readily co-operated with the Official Receiver, and the Official Receiver’s Report, as the evidence that you require to dismiss the Annulment Applications…without a just and independent determination of the facts and merits of the cases.
For the avoidance of doubt, our Liabilities and Assets (i.e. over and above the debt unlawfully claimed through the Fraudulent Petitions produce by E&Y…which must be extinguished), in the circumstance of this case, are our own business, and the only reason that the Court / Official Receiver has become involved in our affairs is because of the securing (by unlawful means) of the Bankruptcy Orders against us by the Conspirators themselves, provides the means through which the allegations can be further stifled…and through further unlawful acts within & without the Court.
Simply put, the interests of the people to who we legitimately owe money, which we have spent the last 4+ years trying to protect, are best protected by ourselves by bringing our legitimate & well evidenced Claims…and not through the disgraceful (and Criminal) acts of the conflicted and gravely irregular “Joint Venture” which has been created between the Court, the Official Receiver, the Treasury Solicitor & the Conspirators.
In summary, we believe that you are preparing (and like a number of your Judicial colleagues before you) to “do the dirty”, and to deny us due process and justice at the Ordered Oral Appeal Hearing…to perpetuate the Cover-Up.
It is our belief, as in the cases of your colleagues, that you are acting, and intending to act, under Undue Influence (and in breach of your Judicial Oath), and it matters not whether that Undue Influence takes the form of bribes / pressure from your colleagues / other parties.
We would also take this opportunity to state our astonishment at the recent discovery that your retirement (and several years before your mandatory retirement) as an Appeal Court Judge was announced on the 28th March ’13, i.e. the very next day after you dishonestly and improperly issued the Orders which form part of this dishonest Scheme.
To be blunt, we are fearful that:
1. Your retirement (forced or otherwise…and with the heavily implicated Lord Justice Rix also “just happening” to “retire” early at the same time, and seemingly without notice) is as a result of the allegations of Misconduct / Corruption in this case, and in another case with many similar characteristics.
2. Your “swan-song”, whether solely of your own volition, or more likely on behalf of your also implicated Judicial colleagues, will be to “kill-off” our Applications, and quite likely ourselves (as we are already borderline suicidal as a result of this Fraud & Cover-Up).
3. As a result of your retirement your final acts as an Appeal Court Judge will not come under any scrutiny, and you will escape (just like members of the Met Police whose conduct is brought into question) the reaches of any disciplinary action, i.e. by the Lord Chief Justice (who retired within hours of our publication of evidence of mass corruption within the Royal Courts) and the Lord Chancellor (who has ignored all of our correspondence and who has vested interests which are preventing him from acting appropriately and justly in this case).
Finally, we would take this opportunity to express our utter dismay that Justice Victoria Sharp has been elevated to the Appeal Court (and after only 4 years at the High Court) and at the same time that yourself and LJ Rix have prematurely retired…given that Justice Sharp upon having intervened and acted improperly in our Proceedings (i.e. to have a blatantly unlawful injunction lifted) was subsequently:
1. Exposed as the wife of Richard Sharpe who in turn is one of the Conservative Party’s largest Donors and an Advisor to George Osborne…and with David Cameron and the Lord Chancellor himself involved in the selection process…a classic conflict of interest.
2. Exposed as being from the same Chambers (One Brick Court) as HHJ Moloney & Justice Eady, both of whom have also acted irregularly in our Proceedings (and we believe under Undue Influence)…to ensure the perpetuation of the Cover-Up.
Most recently it is also now known that Justice Sharpe is also a long term associate / colleague of (until the reshuffle at the Ministry of Justice in ’12…a reshuffle which we suspect was influenced by our case) the Solicitor General Edward Garnier QC MP…also a Barrister at One Brick Court AND also a long-term associate of Olswang’s Geraldine Proudler (who played a disgusting role in the Cover-Up by bringing Libel proceedings despite knowing the truth of the allegations)…with Mr Garnier also having ignored our desperate pleas for Government intervention in our case during his time as Solicitor General.
It is on the basis of the above that we:
1. Once again restate our request that you recuse yourself from our determining our Applications.
2. Restate our request that in the event your still refuse to recuse yourself, that you set-aside your Orders of the 27th March, and without further delay, you make written determinations of our Appeal Court Applications “on the papers”…i.e. as per the normal Judicial Process…and appropriately taking into account / commenting upon all of the evidence of Fraud & Cover-Up provided to you.
3. Restate our request that a further and “stand-alone” Stay related Hearing (i.e. to Stay the execution of our Bankruptcies) is scheduled as soon as possible…and an independent Hearing without the appalling prejudice / bias / misconduct exhibited by your colleague LJ Patten, i.e. on November 13th’12.
4. Have now declined, as is our right, to be interviewed by the Official Receiver until our Appeal Court Applications are fully determined, inc. the subsequent Appeals / further litigation.
5. Are forced to seek interim relief at the High Court.
Finally, in the event that the Official Receiver believes that we do not have the right to withhold co-operation in the circumstances of our case, then we would invite Ms Jackson to initiate Criminal proceedings against us
We look forward to Hearing from you, or alternatively from your successor.
PS. We have copied this correspondence to Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe as Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, and will continue to do so until the ongoing Misconduct / Corruption within the Royal Courts of Justice stops, and before a death is caused…i.e. a death through Reckless Endangerment / Manslaughter by Judicial Office Holders.
LETTER OF 1ST APRIL - LLOYD MAKES HIS FIRST MOVE TO STIFLE THE ALLEGATIONS...AND ANOUNCES HIS RETIREMENT THE DAY AFTER
Lord Justice Lloyd
Civil Appeal Court
Royal Courts of Justice
The Strand
London WC2A 2LL
Chris Coomber & Dawn Burrus
27 Mayfield Road
Crouch End
London N8 9LL
cc1: Karen Jackson – Official Receiver - London
cc2: Paul Stewart – Deputy Official Receiver – London
cc3: Andrew Turek – Treasury Solicitor
cc4: Sarah Parkes – Partner – Freshfields LLP
cc5: Lauren McGuirl – Associate – Freshfields LLP
1st April ‘13
BY EMAIL
Re: Recent Orders / Adjournments – A3/2010/0978B + A2/2010/1748 + A2/2010/1749
We are writing to you following your recent Orders relating to these Applications, i.e. your Orders of the 27th March ’13.
First & foremost we would take this opportunity to express our consternation at the Appeal Court refusing to deal with these 8+ month old Applications “on the papers”, and proposing to determine these Applications in a complex case with a 1 day (i.e. a 5 hour) Oral Hearing, given that:
1. These matters are both contentious and complex, the evidence is voluminous, and the Applications are numerous.
2. The absence of any form of Judgment on the papers ensures that none of these numerous and complex issues will be narrowed down for this Oral Hearing.
3. A hearing duration of 1 day is grossly inadequate to cover even a fraction of the ground required, and is hence grossly prejudicial to us…without any prior Judgment(s) on the papers.
4. You have declined to recuse yourself despite admitting you have links / associations with Justice Lewison & his son, and with other linked parties.
5. The effect of the above is that the Court, in which we cannot be reasonably be expected to have any trust whatsoever given the circumstances / history of this case, with that mistrust underscored by recent developments, is we believe effectively orchestrating a “mini-trial” in grossly prejudicial circumstances, i.e.:
a. With completely insufficient time.
b. With the onus being upon ourselves as inexperienced advocates orally adduce complex evidence spanning literally thousands of pages, evidence which, in our sad experience, the Judge will initial assert he has digested and understood as pre-Reading, but who will then conduct himself / herself as if this evidence is “new news”, and as if the all allegations are entirely unsubstantiated.
c. With no possibility of any further Appeal…and with the initial Civil Fraud Claim which is the subject of this Application already being the subject of well-evidenced allegations of Miscount / Corruption, including a Case Management “trick” which deliberately denied us a vital Appeal stage in the Process, and with further bias / prejudice by LJ’s Rix and Gross then also denying us the opportunity (because of illness…with a short adjournment denied) to attend the final Oral Hearing itself.
d. With a single Lord Justice…and with the only thing preventing 2 Lord Justices be assigned / sitting, as would be the norm, is our financial inability (because of the Fraud) to create further sets of the large number of bundles.
e. With that Lord Justice, i.e. yourself, having closer than would should be acceptable links with parties linked to the cases…i.e. parties asserted to be complicit in the Fraud Scheme and Cover-Up…inc. Lord Justice Lewison & his son Joshua Lewison.
For the avoidance of doubt, we do indeed allege that the son of Justice Lewison, i.e. your own associate Joshua Lewison, is complicit, as is his Father, in the Cover-Up of this Fraud Scheme complained of, and specifically with Joshua Lewison alleged to have been personally involved in the procurement / inducement / coaching of his close friend and Barrister colleague Mark fell to force through the Winding-Up of the defrauded Company “Greystone Houses Ltd”, for entirely “Improper Purposes”…purposes directly related to the desired perpetuation of the Cover-Up (Attachment 1).
f. With ourselves as Victims forced to act as Litigants in Person…because of being financially crippled by the Fraud Scheme AND because our attempts to secure Legal Representation on a CFA & Third Party funded basis were met by relentless interference & dirty tricks (inc. the theft of evidence then passed to the other side…on 2+ occasions) as part of the Cover-Up of what is, and has been proven to be by the evidence now available, gravely Criminal Conduct.
It is on the basis of the above, and other factors outlined below, and given that we are unable to further challenge your refusal to recuse yourself, that we are writing to:
1. Request the Set-Aside of the Orders (i.e. the Adjournments to an Oral Hearing) in Application A3/2010/0978B (i.e. relating to the reopening of a Civil Fraud Claim) AND in Applications A2/2012/1748+1749 (i.e. the Annulment of our Personal Bankruptcies).
2. Request that in relation to the Application A3/2010/0978B:
a. As Per Section VII of PD 52.17 Para 7.4 is determined on the papers and by a single Lord Justice in the first instance…as is the formal requirement as we understand it.
b. As per CPR 52.17(5), and given the gratefully recognised exceptional circumstances of this overall case, that it is ordered, and before the determination on the papers, that an Oral Appeal Hearing WILL BE allowed at the request of the Applicants, i.e. after the determination on the papers…should that be required.
3. Request that in relation to Applications A2/2012/1748+1749 that the Court use its discretion to also initially determine these Applications on the papers in the first instance…not least with the Respondents (and including the Official Receiver) having failed to make any written representations regarding these Applications within the required period, or in the many months since.
4. Request, in any event, that the Oral Hearing of the Applications A2/2010/1748+1749 be adjourned until the Application A3/2012/0978B is initially determined on the papers.
In summary, with the Court now accepting (with the prior guidance of LJ Rimer, himself forced to recuse himself from the case, refusing to accept this basic point) that these 3 Applications are interlinked, and with it being established, we assert, that:
a. the Appeal Court does not have the power / jurisdiction to force an Oral Hearing before the determination of the Application under CPR 52.17 on the papers;
b. the Annulment Applications (A2/2010/1748+9) are dependent upon the Application under CPR 52.17 (A3/2010/0978B), and NOT the other way around;
…the logical consequence is that ALL 3 of our current Applications must be determined on the papers…and before a single Oral Hearing is subsequently held in the event that one or more of the Applications are denied.
5. In the event that the above requests are denied, to request that the Oral Hearing of what are multiple complex Applications be for 3 days, rather than for just 1 day, with a specific duration to be set upon being able to understand the breadth and depth of the narrowed-down issues upon which the determinations actually rest…i.e. after the determinations on the papers.
6. Finally, and given the recent events (inc. the emergence of further fresh and damning evidence of Criminality directly relating to our Personal Bankruptcies) & the worsening of our financial circumstances (and the associated repossession threats to a number of assets…all caused by the premature & prejudicial acts of the Official Receiver) described below, that the Court issue guidance to the Official Receiver that they should not act to seize our income from tenancies, or to progress our Bankruptcies in any way, until these determinations on the papers AND the subsequent Oral Hearing are completed.
We would also take this opportunity to update the Court on a number of relevant developments and our latest concerns regarding the way in which this overall case is being handled by the Appeal Court:
1. The Application under CPR 52.17, i.e. A3/2010/0978B, was first submitted to the Appeal Court on the 22nd April ’12, i.e. nearly 12 months ago, at which time it was wrongly (and we assert dishonestly) dismissed by Deputy Master Bancroft-Rimmer. After having made a complaint / further representations, this Application was finally accepted by the Court on the 2nd July ’12, i.e. 9 months ago.
2. The Applications regarding the Annulments of our Personal Bankruptcies were accepted on the 11thJuly ’12, i.e. again 9 months ago, and just 2 weeks after the refusal of Chief Registrar Baister to Order these Annulments…for want of jurisdiction…in his view.
3. As of last week, we have now been attempting to have our Personal Bankruptcies Annulled at the Royal Courts of Justice for longer than any “normal” people would have been in Bankruptcy, i.e. for 12 months, and with the Bankruptcy Court responsible for 3 months of delays (by refusing to schedule a Hearing for a full 3 months, at which time Chief Registrar Baister simple stated he did not have jurisdiction) and with the Appeal Court now almost entirely responsible for further delays of 8 months.
4. Also as of last week, and in an act of Bad-Faith (as it was done before our Annulment Applications have been determined…which is not our fault), the Official Receiver has contacted the tenant from whom we derive our family income, and Ordered that this tenant pay their rental monies to the Official Receiver directly…an act which makes us destitute and will ensure the repossession of all our remaining property assets, inc. our own family home, within a few short months.
5. We have now, as the Official Receiver has wreaked the damage that we so feared and have tried to protect against (i.e. by not co-operating) as we wait an eternity for our Applications to be dealt with, agreed to co-operate with the Official Receiver, with a view to securing Discharge from Bankruptcy as soon as possible. Our interviews are both scheduled for the 17th April.
6. We have now also formally requested that the Official Receiver assigns all Claims, i.e. in our Personal Names, to us as currently Undischarged Bankrupts…and per the recent correspondence (Attachment 2) we see no legitimate reason why these Assignments cannot be put in place…not least because the Official Receiver has refused to support this litigation…or even recognise the evidence that our Personal Bankruptcies were procured / orchestrated through a number of appalling abuses of the Insolvency Regime.
7. In the Orders of the 28th March ’13 you state that “I have concluded that all these Applications require an Oral Hearing, as the Applicants have requested”. For the avoidance of doubt:
a. We do not believe that we have ever requested that an Oral Hearing is held to determine these Applications before a determination on the papers is made (which has always been our clear expectation…and we assert our right…especially in the Application under CPR 52.17), and the only Oral Hearings we have requested relate to a Stay of the actions of the Official Receiver in executing our Bankruptcy Orders which we wait for these long delayed determinations…inc. based upon the emergence of Criminal Evidence.
For the avoidance of doubt the initial evidence (there is now much more) was “side-stepped”, and we assert dishonestly, by LJ Patten in the Hearing of the 13thNovember ’12…as the Judgment WILL SHOW (which has strangely, despite having been produced at the Public Expense, not been forthcoming in the last 4+ months), and as the Transcript of this appalling Hearing WOULD UNEQUIVOCALLY CONFIRM…if & when funds become available to have this produced (as LJ Patten refused to have this produced at the Public Expense).
b. We cannot help but feel that this statement is a misrepresentation of the nature of our own representations to the Court, with a number of similar misrepresentations by the Appeal Court having also been made in the past, and especially by LJ’s Patten & Tomlinson…i.e. in relation to the nature of our Stay Application before the Court.
8. Again in the Orders of the 28th March ’13, in relation to our request that you recuse yourself from this case, you make two further statements;
a. “This ground of objection tends to give the impression that the Applicants are seeking to choose the judge who is to hear their Applications, which they are not entitled to do”.
b. “So far as Lord Justice Lewison is concerned, the Applicants rightly accept that some degree of association will exist between the Judge who decides these Applications and Lord Justice Lewison…”.
9. It is plainly evident that we are not attempting to choose a specific Judge, and we would be lying if we said we had faith in the supposed independence of ANY Appeal Court Judge in the appalling circumstances of this case. All we are trying to do is to protect our Human Rights which the Court (and including the Appeal Court) have trampled on with impunity, i.e. our rights to access a demonstrably independent Judicial Process.
10.Stated another way, whilst a degree of association is unfortunately inevitable, this is not a good thing, and it does not mean that:
a. The Court is not obliged to try and minimise these associations…not least with nearly 40 Appeal Court Judges to choose from.
b. The Court has license to disregard our Human Rights. In fact the opposite is true, the Court must now take even more stringent measures to ensure that our Human Rights are protected in light of these associations, inc. we assert by agreeing to the token & non-prejudicial requests made above, with a refusal to grant any of these requests providing further evidence of the Court’s continuing bad-faith and prejudice / bias against us.
11.Simply put, if the Court is not attempting to seek to gain advantage, i.e. for its own ends and those of the numerous Accused parties who have been shown to have such intimate connections with the Court, we can see no legitimate grounds for refusing to grant these requests made herein, i.e. to protect our legitimate rights…and not to protect the illegitimate interests of the Court and its associates.
12.Relatedly, we feel that the Court is refusing, and for its own ends, to recognise the full circumstances of this case, and to conduct itself accordingly…not least given the possible implications for the Court itself should any Civil or Criminal Fraud Action come to Trial, given that this will likely expose the prior conduct of the a significant number of Judicial Office Holders who “just happened” to have been involved in this case (and who acted irregularly and with bias and prejudice) whilst having undisclosed links to the Conspirators; links which could most definitely be described as being a “personal friendship” or a “close association”.
13.On the basis of the above, and given the specific nature of this case, we reasonably assert that no Judicial Office Holder at the Royal Courts of Justice can claim to be independent to the extent required to ensure that our Human Rights are protected…and with ALL the evidence from our approaching 4 years of litigation within the Royal Courts of Justice demonstrating this assertion to be entirely valid.
14.Also, with regard to a determination on the papers, you have thankfully confirmed that you have read all the materials cited in the updated Reading List, and you will have therefore formed in your mind, and may have already committed your thoughts to paper in the form of Draft Judgments, a view of what the material issues are. Whilst you presumably have it in your mind to explore those issues at the Oral Hearing, in denying us the benefit / right of a prior determination on the papers (and particularly of the Application under CPR 52.17) you are further prejudicing an already seriously prejudiced case.
15.We would also take this opportunity to describe to the Court how we believe we are now caught in a “pincer action” between the Court and the Court’s Officer, i.e. the Official Receiver.
16.Specifically, it was on Monday the 25th March ’13, and approaching 500 days since we were (unlawfully) made Bankrupt (and having been denied Due Process ever since), that the Official Receiver acted to seize our family income…in the full knowledge that our Annulment Applications have been delayed / side-stepped for a staggering 12 months. It was then within just 48 hours of that appalling act, that the Orders of the 27thMarch were produced…adjourning all 3 Applications to a single Oral Hearing.
17.The effect of what we fear to have been a co-ordinated action, given that your Orders mean that ALL of our litigation (and our very lives) rests on a Hearing of just 5 hours duration, and with the other aspects of prejudice outlined above, is that we as vulnerable Litigants in Person and clear Victims of a Fraud and Cover-Up, are now faced with the prospect of living (and with 3 children and no financial reserves / wider support whatsoever…and facing the inevitable repossession of our family home) with NO INCOME, in the event that we do now do anything to seek to defend our rights to a fair and independent Judicial Process…i.e. acts which will further delay these Proceedings…and delay the redress which we are so clearly entitled to. For the avoidance of doubt we will not yield to this co-ordinated action.
It is hard to convey in writing how strongly we feel about Judicial Office Holders, as we see it, continuing to abuse the Judicial Process, and their discretions, in order to “kill-off” these exceptionally well-evidenced allegations by any and all means possible (inc. unlawful means)…and for what are clearly “Improper Purposes”…and we genuinely believe that these Orders represent “more of the same”.
Specifically, we believe that the Appeal Court is continuing, and dishonestly so, to seek to exploit our weaknesses (i.e. as non-qualified and inexperienced advocates) whilst seeking to negate our strengths (as parties with valid Claims, and a mountain of evidence to support those Claims) at the same time as maintaining a thin veneer of legitimacy to a crass process…a process that can never survive any detailed scrutiny by independent and informed parties.
To be completely frank we consider these Orders to be the “latest move” in what the Appeal Court is treating as a “game”…and in the full knowledge that this “game” is likely to have deadly consequences for ourselves as long oppressed and intimidated, not to mention seriously vulnerable, Victims.
For the avoidance of doubt the Court has been warned of the serious Clinical Depressions of us both (as a result of this Fraud Scheme & Cover-Up), and of the near death, by suicide, of Chris Coomber, following the appalling events of Q4 ’11…inc. Justice Arnold’s disgusting and blatantly dishonest determination of our Bankruptcy Proceedings in our legitimate and forewarned absence.
Finally, we are also writing to submit 2 further Applications to the Appeal Court, both of which are designed to ensure, when combined with the assignment of our Personal Claims from the Official Receiver, there are no barriers to allowing the Claim under CPR 52.17, and for all parties, to be determined on the papers and before the Annulment Applications:
1. “Greystone Houses Ltd” Restored to the Company Register– With Chris Coomber as an ex-Director & Creditor, for the defrauded Company “Greystone Houses Ltd”, to be temporarily restored to / allowed to remain on, via a Court Order, the Companies Register, for the purposes of conducting these and any related Proceedings only.
2. Chris Coomber Reinstated as Director of the Restored “Greystone Houses Ltd” - With the leave of the Court, for Chris Coomber be granted permission, under Chapter 20 Rule 6.203 of the Insolvency Rules 1986, i.e. as an Undischarged Bankrupt, to be temporarily reinstated as Director of the defrauded Company “Greystones Houses Ltd” for the purposes of these and any related Proceedings only, i.e. so as Chris Coomber can legally represent the interests of the Shareholders / Creditors of these damaged Companies.
In summary, to protect our Human Rights, and to protect (as far as is possible now that matters have progressed so far) the Court from further allegations of Misconduct / Corruption, we believe that the Court should agree to our proportionate and non-prejudicial / anti-prejudicial requests to allow these Civil Proceedings to progress in the “least-worst” way possible.
We look forward to a rapid and reasoned response.
Yours sincerely
Chris Coomber
Dawn Burrus